I always use the Intel 311 SSD's they are 20 GB SLC Drives priced very aggressive for a Single Level Cell drive, have yet to see one fail, and have shipped way over 100 of them for various embedded systems.
Med venlig hilsen, Best regards Ulrik Lunddahl Sales Manager - Salgschef PROconsult Data A/S - Rugårdsvej 15 - 5000 Odense C Tel: +45 63113333 - Tel dir: +45 63113341 - Mobil: +45 26363341 - Fax: +45 63113344 E-mail: u...@proconsult.dk - Web site: www.proconsult.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] På vegne af Jeppe Øland Sendt: 21. marts 2012 18:40 Til: pfSense support and discussion Emne: Re: [pfSense] pfSense error, maybe hard drive? > I deployed about a dozen Kingston 64G SSDs about a year and a half ago > (in laptops and desktops) and I've seen about a quarter of them fail > with different symptoms in each case. Garbage Totally agree. I have gone through 2 Kingston 4GB industrial SSDs so far - and it didn't take long either. They fail fast! (Now I'm using the 3rd one with an embedded install ... it seems to stay alive when nobody is writing to it). On the OCZ Vertex drives, I would avoid Vertex1 ... they die pretty quick too if you write a lot. Vertex2 has been rock solid. Regards, -Jeppe _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
