Op 3-4-2012 9:04, Brian Henson schreef:
Another strange thing is when i try to ping a host on the lan that i
have set a static ip i get this

ping6: sendmsg: Permission denied
ping6: wrote 2001:470:b:405::51 16 chars, ret=-1

The firewall rules might be out of date preventing other communications. This is likely pf firewall rules preventing it.

Is the "disable IPv6" checked under advanced.

Cheers,

Seth

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Brian Henson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Oops 2.0 upgraded to 2.1 snapshot


    On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Seth Mos <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Op 3-4-2012 8:33, Brian Henson schreef:

            Yes i have it set to managed. I pulled the branch down when
            i was on 2.0
            RC3 and got it working. but this is a fresh install of 2.0
            upgraded to 2.0.1


        Don't you mean 2.1? IPv6 support is only available there. In 2.0
        the global IPv6 disable flag would drop all ipv6 traffic.

        Regards,

        Seth


            On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Seth Mos <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

                Op 3-4-2012 8:20, Brian Henson schreef:

                    I have checked the /64 and the wan is on the wan and
            the Lan is
                    setup
                    right. Files and info requested are below. I had
            this setup
                    perfectly
                    before its just not wanting to work now.


                Yeah, your config file and configuration check out. I
            wasn't aware
                that this setup worked previously.

                I see that your network is set to "managed", is that
            correct?

                We only just switched out rtadvd for radvd and don't
            know all the
                possible error messages it can throw. And more
            importantly, for what
                reason.

                Regards,

                Seth
                ___________________________________________________
                List mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>__>
            http://lists.pfsense.org/____mailman/listinfo/list
            <http://lists.pfsense.org/__mailman/listinfo/list>
            <http://lists.pfsense.org/__mailman/listinfo/list
            <http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list>>





            _________________________________________________
            List mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.pfsense.org/__mailman/listinfo/list
            <http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list>


        _________________________________________________
        List mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.pfsense.org/__mailman/listinfo/list
        <http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list>





_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to