Jim Pingle <[email protected]> wrote: >[Please don't threadjack. Start a fresh message rather than replying to >an existing message, or threading mailreaders will bury your message >under an unrelated topic] > >On 6/27/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Landman wrote:> Hi folks ... any guidance on >the 2.1 timeline? Is it considered stable >> for end user use yet? I'd prefer to deploy things actually marked as >> stable (we have 2.0.1 in use at customer sites, and are playing with >it >> internally). I'd like to get 2.1 up for better driver support (and >ease >> of building drivers). Thanks! > >Hopefully sometime in the next couple months. We still have a few >blocking issues to tackle before we'll even push a BETA1. > >Many of us are running it in production in areas that need IPv6 or have >hardware that requires the newer drivers. Basically if it works for >you, >it should keep working, but if it doesn't work, you should know right >away. Not easy to back down from it though. > >Problem areas in current snapshots are VLANs, NanoBSD read-only remount >slowness, and there are still some packages that need work to be usable >on 2.1.
Jim, It will be based on what freebsd version? Thanks, Matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, the God of balance you shall be _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
