Is there a work around for this?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 18

Send List mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of List digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: DHCP Issue (Seth Mos)
   2. Pfsense NAT pool statistic (Olaf de Bree)
   3. Limit all or per user? (Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:22:11 +0200
From: Seth Mos <[email protected]>
To: pfSense support and discussion <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pfSense] DHCP Issue
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

That is a general and very common issue related to failover dhcp. I remember it 
being one of the limitations of the isc dhcp failover. Maybe the newer 4.2 in 
pfSense 2.1 is any better. Do not know.

Maybe existing clients will get their lease approved, but new clients will not.

That is just a hypothesis though.

Regards,

Seth



Gordon Cook <[email protected]>schreef:

>I have been working with two HACOM Mars II boxes running pfSense 2.0.1 in a 
>test environment.  I did notice an issue related to DHCP on the LAN ports.  If 
>one of the boxes is down and you do a restore from backup on the running box 
>DHCP does not work till the second box is brought backup.  I tried rebooting 
>the box again, restarted the DHCP service, disabling and then re-enabling DHCP.
>I believe that the issue is related to the fact that the box is trying to 
>communicate with the second box and doesn't see it.
>
>
>Gord
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>List mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/attachments/20120712/ac1334e9/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:04:20 +1000
From: Olaf de Bree <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pfSense] Pfsense NAT pool statistic
Message-ID:
        <CAAVr=y66zYvK--p-FJyQfotXRuSVzbOiDC7_=bsp0Hx0L=-s...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi All,

I'm hoping some one may be able to help me with finding NAT statistics when 
translating to an address pool in Pfsense . What i really after is the pool 
usage or number of allocated addresses as per the Cisco example is below Is 
this kind of information available some where in Phsense?

Any help greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Olaf

show ip nat statistics

Total translations: 2 (0 static, 2 dynamic; 0 extended)

Outside interfaces: Serial0

Inside interfaces: Ethernet1

Hits: 135  Misses: 5

Expired translations: 2

Dynamic mappings:

-- Inside Source

access-list 1 pool net-208 refcount 2

 pool net-208: netmask 255.255.255.240

        start 172.16.233.208 end 172.16.233.221

        type generic, total addresses 14, allocated 2 (14%), misses 0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/attachments/20120713/02b55492/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:44:55 -0500
From: "Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca" <[email protected]>
To: "'pfSense support and discussion'" <[email protected]>
Subject: [pfSense] Limit all or per user?
Message-ID: <470a01cd610e$737d7290$5a7857b0$@ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Just wondering how others have handled this in the past.

 

I want to broadcast to about 40-50 devices (pc/tablet/phone for the most
part)   I want mine, the wife's and perhaps a few other family members to
have full speed, and not blocking torrents, streaming etc.

 

Now. for the other users I just want to give them a fairly basic connection.
I only have a TOTAL of 3Mb down 1Mb up to share so its not a lot to start with, 
and I want the hogs to be slow down if other users are on. if they want to 
download overnight that is fine.

 

Thoughts?>  Or a how to?

 

---Andrew

ATM Logic

Never memorize something that you can Google

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/attachments/20120713/7506ca07/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


End of List Digest, Vol 11, Issue 18
************************************
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to