On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Oliver Schad <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> pfsense enforces carp constraints which restrict usage of carp to a use
> case where the host IP must be in the same network as the virtual IP.
>
> If I look into the BSD documentation I don't find this restriction. I
> read in the OpenBSD documentation (sorry for that, but I don't find it
> in the FreeBSD docs):
>
> "This is the shared IP address assigned to the redundancy group. This
> address does not have to be in the same subnet as the IP address on the
> physical interface (if present). This address needs to be the same on
> all hosts in the group, however."
>
> Do you agree with this documentation on FreeBSD? If so I wish strongly
> to remove the restriction in the pfSense software.
>
>
The only problem on your logic is that Open and Free do not have the same
carp version.
In FreeBSD 9 you can use a /30 ip as a vip since only one address is
required rather than 3 for carp.


> We have a use case here, where we want to build up a HA solution with
> some /29 IPv4 networks. If you assume that you get many public /29
> networks you don't want to assign for each pfSense a address from all
> networks.
>
> Assume all addresses are in use with 1:1 NAT - you see the problem here?
> I have to change many many many stuff here to make it work with a
> pfsense HA cluster. Not everywhere is DNS used, find all clients which
> uses this IP and port, make change requests to other companies ...
>
> The easiest way to migrate would be to make the "old" public IP the
> virtual IP and give the devices one public IP from only one subnet or
> give them no public host IP at all. In the second case the backup
> device woudln't have a working default route but that would be okay in
> this case.
>
Change the setup is much more expensive, so no default route is the
> better case.
>
> Regards
> Oli
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to