2012/12/18 Eugen Leitl <[email protected]>

>
> Apparently, my home ISP (Kabel Deutschland) is rolling out IPv6 in
> my segment (in fact, they are doing DS-Lite to those new customers with
> a non-Cisco cable modem) so I can use 6to4 with pfSense 2.1-BETA1:
>
> [2.1-BETA1][[email protected]]/root(5): ping6 ipv6.google.com
> PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2002:b21a:13da:: --> 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=0 hlim=57 time=34.069 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=1 hlim=57 time=31.432 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=2 hlim=57 time=43.706 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=3 hlim=57 time=32.256 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=4 hlim=57 time=31.344 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=5 hlim=57 time=32.164 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=6 hlim=57 time=39.633 ms
> 16 bytes from 2a00:1450:4016:801::1013, icmp_seq=7 hlim=57 time=44.467 ms
>
> However, I have no clue how to allocate my LAN systems an IPv6 address.
>
> Do I have to allocate static IPv6 for the pfSense LAN and each
> system on the network from 2002:b21a:13da:: ?
>
> I've put "Track Interface" as IPv6 Configuration Type of LAN, and
> Track IPv6 Interface as WAN (with no Prefix ID) and now it just
> seems to work (TM). I can ping ipv6.google.com from Windows 7,
> but I don't see the dancing kame.
>
> Am I on that new-fangled IPng thang already? Or why doesn't IPv6
> have precedence? I thought Windows 7 by default would prefer IPv6
> for dual-stacked hosts.
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>

Hi Eugen,

may be that could help http://www.feyrer.de/IPv6/ueberreuter-6to4.html (german
page)

May be OT:
<http://www.feyrer.de/IPv6/ueberreuter-6to4.html>even if its old - i had to
laugh after reading the title again:
Date of the Page/Article: 2001-09-19
Title: ipv6 the new internet protocol - Rapid deployment of IPv6 with 6to4

loool if 12 years (and we didn't have it fully done yet) are rapid, what is
the definition of slow?

i still remember i had to buy a new book to get that IPv6 stuff.
The good old TCP/IP from  Richard W. Stevens didn't covered that.

Now we have 2013, in few days, if the funny interpretions of the mayan
calnedar aren't right - umh or was it a aztec calendar, however
and...how far are we with IPv6 - lol

Back to the RFC1918 equivalent:
http://serverfault.com/questions/216602/what-is-the-ipv6-equivalent-to-ipv4-rfc1918-addresses
english readers might find this helpful?

hope it helps a bit - or at least somebody can laugh

greetings

m.
-- 
= = =  http://michael-schuh.net/  = = =
Projektmanagement - IT-Consulting - Professional Services IT
Michael Schuh
Postfach 10 21 52
66021 Saarbrücken
phone: 0681/8319664
@: m i c h a e l . s c h u h @ g m a i l . c o m

= = =  Ust-ID:  DE251072318  = = =
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to