Hi again, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:45:27PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > > Is this really needed for each interface, or is it sufficient to put it > > only once ? If we set it multiple times I believe the synchronization is > > done multiple times too, and doing a simple modification and applying > > changes takes ages. > > It is really needed for each interface.
What I find very strange is that even when removing the failover IP address for one of the interfaces, the synchronization still takes place, that's why I wondered if defining it on each interface was really needed. > > Also, if it's needed for all interfaces, should we specify each time the > > IP address matching the other node on the same interface, or should we > > use, for all interfaces, the IP address of the other node has on the > > pfsync interface ? > > You must use the IP for the other node in the subnet being served on > that interface. So each interface will have a different IP address. > > There was an issue with the way the dhcp server config was being synced > but a commit was made in the last week or so to fix it. Last I heard it > was working better. I'll try to upgrade ASAP and see if it's better. BTW our upgrades with full backup take a very very long time because the full backup script includes Squid's cache. Yesterday I've tried to modify it to add "--exclude var/squid/cache" on tar's command line and launch the full backup manually, but the cache is still included in the full backup. Any idea why ? Shouldn't the full backup script, if the squid package is installed, ignore squid's cache directories ? TIA -- Jérôme Alet - <[email protected]> - Direction du Système d'Information Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie - BPR4 - 98851 NOUMEA CEDEX Tél : +687 290081 Fax : +687 254829 _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
