On 20-3-2013 0:29, Zach Underwood wrote:
> I am setting up a pair of pfsense servers in front of a web hosting
> setup. I have two firewalls, two network switches(layer 3 stacked), and
> two isp links using BGP. I plan on using OSPF on the network switches to
> pass the routeing tables to pfsense. The way I am think of doing is this
> way 
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1AE-Uif6n0qrFxnDp6JkxUPaYEwVZJoa69pnCMAIW-4E/edit?usp=sharing
> . Is this the best way or there a better way.

Indeed it looks right from here.

The situation will be as follows, you setup a iBGP or OSPF between the 2
pfSense hosts. Careful with OSPF that you don't accidentally export
internal routes to BGP.

Each pfSense node should have 1 session with a BGP peer but a shared LAN
CARP address. You should never tie the BGP session to a CARP address,
and often that isn't even possible because you get a unrouteable /30
uplink anyhow.

- If a pfSense node fails, internal BGP/OSPF will re-route the traffic
out the other pipe.
- If a BGP session drops, internal BGP/OSPF will re-route the traffic.
- LAN hosts always use the CARP address as the gateway.
- You can not stateful firewall on the pfSense nodes, traffic is
inherently asymmetric when using BGP. (e.g. traffic goes out BGP1 but
returns on BGP2)

Regards,
Seth
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to