On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, James Caldwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jim, > > That’s very interesting. If not directly integrated into pfsense how do you > envision it might take shape? In general I'm not ready to discuss pfSense futures on list. However, if you think of pfSense as an appliance platform, you will be on the right track. > What do you think of Glenn Kelley’s comment about the very impressive numbers > he’s been getting using Traffic Squeezer? Impressive, but it's data dependent, of course. Jim > > James > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jim Thompson > Sent: April-12-13 1:32 PM > To: pfSense support and discussion > Cc: pfSense support and discussion > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Open Source WAN Optimization > > > On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Warren Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, James Caldwell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial > > alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be great if some of > > solution like this was available and even better if we could run it inside > > of pfsense. Cheers. > > > > There is WANProxy http://wanproxy.org/ but never used it so can't comment on > its performance or how well it works. > > > Chris and I have recently discussed adding WANproxy to the mix. Maybe not as > part of pfSense, but certainly in the same mold. > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
