Hi, Thank for your advise.
I have try already this tune http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tuning_and_Troubleshooting_Network_Cards,it seems doesnt help. I will consider about changing NIC model currently i'm using realtek Pfsense 2.0.3, I dont have view on the whole feature and bug fixed...but what i know the pfsenes 2.0.3 create many interrupt request of HDD (IDE Mode) and sometime it's cannot detect the LAN gateway (pcs customer-> cisco router ->pfsense ->internet). Thank again for your replys. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send List mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of List digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT (Makara) > 2. Re: Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT (Chris Buechler) > 3. Re: Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT (Seth Mos) > 4. Re: Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT (David Burgess) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:27:59 +0700 > From: Makara <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [pfSense] Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT > Message-ID: > < > cahooarxcmbvxwzevd8jw3g9hv8rtrqly1vp9qhaeldse0k4...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi List, > > We are using pfsense for NAT purpose, around 1000 customers concurrent and > the bandwidth is around 500MBPS. We have problem the pfsense is stuck > around 1 or 2 week always. > > HW: Dell Optiplex 7010 > OS: Pfsense 2.0-RC3(We downgrade the latest version because it's too many > problem that this version) > > Please kindly advise. > > -- > The person who loves others will also be loved. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/attachments/20130522/f506426a/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 04:51:36 -0400 > From: Chris Buechler <[email protected]> > To: pfSense support and discussion <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT > Message-ID: > <CAOMqvJCFOkkugQhSk5TRt1Wqcp=5O3K8tntm5O5iy4R= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Makara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > We are using pfsense for NAT purpose, around 1000 customers concurrent > and > > the bandwidth is around 500MBPS. We have problem the pfsense is stuck > around > > 1 or 2 week always. > > > > HW: Dell Optiplex 7010 > > OS: Pfsense 2.0-RC3(We downgrade the latest version because it's too many > > problem that this version) > > > > What doesn't work in 2.0.3 that does in 2.0-RC3? AFAIK, nothing, 2.0.3 > is significantly better than any pre-2.0 release. Really need to start > with getting on a supported version. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:41:52 +0200 > From: Seth Mos <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 22-5-2013 6:27, Makara wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > We are using pfsense for NAT purpose, around 1000 customers concurrent > > and the bandwidth is around 500MBPS. We have problem the pfsense is > > stuck around 1 or 2 week always. > > > > HW: Dell Optiplex 7010 > > OS: Pfsense 2.0-RC3(We downgrade the latest version because it's too > > many problem that this version) > > When pushing that much traffic with that amount of customers I recommend > purchasing 2 real servers with Intel network cards and ECC memory and > setting up a carp cluster. > > Regards, > > Seth > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 08:22:20 -0600 > From: David Burgess <[email protected]> > To: pfSense support and discussion <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] Need advise or best practice for pfsense NAT > Message-ID: > < > cakveoqkczzcpy5kml5dks8nufpqafmr2oxtep8sol+t8dlw...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On 2013-05-21 10:28 PM, "Makara" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi List, > > > > We are using pfsense for NAT purpose, around 1000 customers concurrent > and the bandwidth is around 500MBPS. We have problem the pfsense is stuck > around 1 or 2 week always. > > You may want to try some of these: > > http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tuning_and_Troubleshooting_Network_Cards > > But as Chris said, start by getting on the stable release. > > db > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/attachments/20130522/74aae656/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > > End of List Digest, Vol 21, Issue 22 > ************************************ > -- The person who loves others will also be loved.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
