On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > it will actually be more > difficult to understand routing because you *do* have experience with NAT... > you will have to un-learn NAT before figuring out routing. >
Totally agree. That was my case. I thought for some time that NAT was always needed because packets with a source IP from a different network would not be received by devices on the destination network. Ridiculous, I know, but NAT was used where I was working at the time and I considered it the only option. -- Saludos. Gerardo. http://www.nowinchess.com _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
