On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Ernst den Broeder <[email protected]>wrote:
> > I have an ipsec tunnel setup between two pfsense boxes. The tunnel is > working great, and I am allowing my office's /24 network to access a remote > datacenters /24 public ips through the vpn.**** > **** > The problem is that we have one ip (.103) on the remote network which I > need to NOT go through the vpn.**** > > > > I think this is a routing situation that I believe you solve via rules on > the LAN side of the remote pfSense box. I do something like this at home > with 3 devices on my home lan - I nat their private IP addresses over a VPN > link that terminates in the USA (for Netflix), the rest of my internal IP's > nat over my 'normal' public IP. > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Thanks all. Yeah I'm going to have to break up my phase two into multiple smaller subnets.. I was hoping there was something simple i could do. Ernst, The ipsec tunnel happens before the routing tables are taken into effect, so this will not work for my case. Thanks, Dan
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
