On Friday, September 27, 2013 03:27:12 PM Eugen Leitl wrote: > All the IPv6 guys I asked said to never do that.
The beauty is - your network, your rules :-). > I can see when I would use a much smaller subnet > e.g. for building a tunnel or CARP, but that's a very > special case. /128's for Loopback, and /126's (and recently, /127's) for point-to-point. > While /64 per LAN segment is wasteful ( /80 or even /96 > for end users might have been enough), we're stuck with > it for a long while. I don't dispute that - if you certainly want the benefits of SLAAC, you will have no other option other than /64; and since DHCPv6 doesn't support passing of the Router option, you end up having to use both SLAAC and DHCPv6 together. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
