*What part about taking this conversation somewhere else is so hard to understand?* *Really people, that is enough.*
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Chris L <c...@viptalk.net> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Joe Landman <land...@scalableinformatics.com> > wrote: > > > I just worked out setting up new filters for the recent S/N destroying, > high tin-foil-hat content, on gmail. Since people pleading for this to go > away hasn't worked, technological measures to restore S/N for my inbox on > this list have been engaged. > > > > Please folks, take the tin foil hat discussion elsewhere. Please? > > > > > Wow. Still denigrating those concerned about wholesale US(!) government > surveillance of the internet and back doors in encryption products as > "tinfoil hat" huh? > > Seems to me everything they've been saying for the past couple decades > turned out to be true, and we likely don't know most of it yet. > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
