it would be a lot of work. There was some work done back in history on a MIPS port. It never actually finished.
There is very little interest in a SPARC port, though, as Adam allowed, nobody would really mind, other than the consequences of what to call it, and how to explain the support model for it, etc. Jim On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Adam Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > pfSense only supports x86 and amd64 architectures. Though, I suppose if you > wanted to port it to SPARC nobody would mind. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Jim Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Unlikely. >> >> -- Jim >> >> > On Dec 9, 2013, at 4:07, Denny Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > hi, >> > >> > I want to use old two of Sun Fire SPARC v215 for pfsense. FreeBSD 8/98 >> > runs without any problems, so the only question is, if it does make sense >> > to >> > compile pfsense on that hosts. >> > >> > Ram: 12GB >> > >> > # cat /proc/cpuinfo >> > cpu : TI UltraSparc IIIi (Jalapeno) >> > fpu : UltraSparc IIIi integrated FPU >> > pmu : ultra3i >> > prom : OBP 4.22.33 2007/06/18 12:47 >> > type : sun4u >> > ncpus probed : 2 >> > ncpus active : 2 >> > D$ parity tl1 : 0 >> > I$ parity tl1 : 0 >> > cpucaps : >> > flush,stbar,swap,muldiv,v9,ultra3,mul32,div32,v8plus,vis,vis2 >> > Cpu0ClkTck : 0000000059a53800 >> > Cpu1ClkTck : 0000000059a53800 >> > MMU Type : Cheetah+ >> > State: >> > CPU0: online >> > CPU1: online >> > >> > cu denny >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > List mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> _______________________________________________ >> List mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
