On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Erik Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, thanks.  I looked around the developer site for a code overview but
> didn't see much.
>
> Where do you think the crux of the matter lies, in racoon, setkey, or the
> way freebsd is handling it?
>
>
racoon + setkey.
There is all that is to it.


> How do other firewalls on a linux platform work around this?  A recompile
> of ipsec tools, or deeper?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ermal Luçi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Since the start of the project the demand for this kind of setup has been
>> low.
>> Hence no real focus has been put into it.
>>
>> This is for now. If you come with a patch for it will gladly review it
>> for inclusion!
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Erik Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> No other way around the security policy?  Why can't it be firewall
>>> ruled?  This seems impossible, or perhaps a bug, not sure.  Nearly every
>>> other commercial firewall has this ability.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Ermal Luçi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah expect that setkey used on pfsense is the one coming with
>>>> ipsec-tools.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Erik Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I see they know.
>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=setkey&sektion=8
>>>>>
>>>>> No other alternatives to selectively route ports to an ipsec vpn?
>>>>>
>>>>> *BUGS <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=setkey&sektion=8#end>*
>>>>>
>>>>>      The *setkey* utility should report and handle syntax errors better.
>>>>>
>>>>>      For IPsec gateway configuration, *src**_**range*     and 
>>>>> *dst**_**range* with TCP/UDP
>>>>>      port number do not   work, as the gateway does not reassemble 
>>>>> packets (can-
>>>>>      not inspect upper-layer headers).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Ermal Luçi <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to tell even racoon about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Erik Friesen <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been trying to set up an ipsec vpn to only route from/to tcp
>>>>>>> port 80 and 440.  The vpn sets up fine, but since there is no setting in
>>>>>>> the gui for ports, I have taken to hand trying some different SPDs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From the command line:
>>>>>>> setkey -FP  - erases current spd's
>>>>>>> setkey -f filename - loads new file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this is one I have tried -
>>>>>>> spdadd -4 192.168.0.1/32 192.168.0.0/24 any -P out none;
>>>>>>> spdadd -4 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1/32 any -P in none;
>>>>>>> spdadd -4 192.168.0.0/24[any] <http://192.168.0.0/24%5Bany%5D>
>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0[80] <http://0.0.0.0/0%5B80%5D> tcp -P out ipsec
>>>>>>> esp/tunnel/69.27.61.178-199.19.252.164/unique;
>>>>>>> spdadd -4 0.0.0.0/0[any] <http://0.0.0.0/0%5Bany%5D>
>>>>>>> 192.168.0.0/24[80] <http://192.168.0.0/24%5B80%5D> tcp -P in ipsec
>>>>>>> esp/tunnel/199.19.252.164-69.27.61.178/unique;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and many other combinations between the [].  However, a port number
>>>>>>> seems to break it, where no traffic get routed to the ipsec interface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know this would take a bit of coding to inhibit the auto update
>>>>>>> from xml, but otherwise would this be doable if setkey/racoon?? would
>>>>>>> cooperate?  Or are there other factors at play?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> List mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ermal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> List mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> List mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> List mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to