Le 8 mai 2014 à 21:18, Jim Thompson <[email protected]> a écrit :

> On May 8, 2014, at 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Hi we are french resellers of Alix / APU
>> 
>> 
>> Le 6 mai 2014 à 21:16, Vick Khera <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> 
>>> I have the dual ALIX RM1U box from netgate which is a bit over 2 years old 
>>> now (and an older one too!)
>>> 
>>> Has anyone attempted replacing the ALIX boards with APU2 boards? They 
>>> appear to use the identical openings and case mounting holes.
>> 
>> This is true. 
> 
> PC Engines updated their cases about 9 months ago.   Cases older than this 
> are about 1mm too small.
> 
>> APU1C comes with an iron plate to be sticked below the APU in order  to 
>> dissipate the heat. 
> 
> Iron?   It’s a heat-conductive pad, with an aluminum plate.
> 
>>> Netgate themselves doesn't sell such a beast so it made me curious as to 
>>> why they wouldn't sell a version with the board swapped and instead 
>>> recommend other devices.
>> 
>> I can’t really tell why NetGate does not resale APU1C 
> 
> http://store.netgate.com/APU1C.aspx (board only, 2GB ram)
> http://store.netgate.com/APU1C4.aspx (board only, 4GB ram)
> http://store.netgate.com/NetgateAPU2.aspx  (system, 2GB ram)
> http://store.netgate.com/NetgateAPU2.aspx  (system, 4GB ram)
> 
>> Currently there is a problem with the MSata sold by PCEngines which does not 
>> support TRIM - this has a limited effect on pfSense where TRIM is not 
>> activated by default. That being said It is not really « normal » for an 
>> MSata device not to support such function and might reveal some other 
>> problems… though so far we have noticed 0 problem on such device. 
> 
> These cards DO support TRIM, but you have to correctly install software on 
> the device to have it be stable.  We are working on a “platform specific 
> release” of pfSense for the APU>

I am talking about PCEngine's ref : 

http://www.pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm

As stated : « Currently on shipment hold . Some customer reported problems 
leading to data loss, e.g. with Sophos UTM. We finally managed to duplicate the 
problem. We suspect that it is related to the TRIM function included in modern 
file systems (e.g. Linux EXT4). » 

This ref has problem with TRIM. 
So you might want to wait for the problem to be solved (which might probably be 
« never ») or find another ref. 

> 
>> We have updated the firmware of the 10 units we have received so far. 
>> We are currently testing the unit with quite good results considering the 
>> price. 
>> 
>>> Also does anyone know of a crypto accelerator board for the APU2? Or is 
>>> that even worth the effort for 4 home-office OpenVPN tunnels?
>> 
>> You really don’t need such item - processor is strong enough to handle any 
>> kind of local VPN (our test shows about 80Mb/s with an OVPN tunnel)… 
> 
> We’re testing 67 Mbps using UDP over OpenVPN AES256.   AES-128 is about 
> 78Mbps.

That’s the figure that we have also. 

> But “don’t really need” is strong language, and to be clear, I disagree.   My 
> connection from my house is faster than this.

Of course if you operate a 100Mb full duplex line from your home this won’t be 
sufficient… ;-) 

But, to get back to the question « does anyone know of a crypto accelerator 
board for the APU2? » 
—> I am not aware of such device for the time being. 

> 
> Jim

________________________________________________
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Your provider of OpenSource Appliances
www.osnet.eu            
________________________________________________
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to