No.
> On May 11, 2014, at 14:48, Stefan Baur <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 11.05.2014 21:28, schrieb Ryan Coleman: > >>> The simple solution is to block all outbound DNS at the firewall, but >>> this can also break things (like some Google and Apple devices). >>> Even broken devices usually have a fallback mode, but be careful of >>> what breaks when you do this! > >> Correct. Using this feature will break any client with a hard-defined >> DNS - as we found out in testing at the bar. > > (Guys, could we please use proper quoting etiquette instead of > full-quoting and alternating top- and bottom-posting?) > > I've never tried this in combination with a captive portal, but how > about redirecting *:53 to the pfsense DNS with a NAT rule that listens > on LAN instead of WAN? > Would that break the captive portal setup? > > -Stefan > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
