But the bridging interface must have a public IP or do I have to set it up
as IP-Less ???



On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ivo Tonev <[email protected]> wrote:

> bridge is necessary, without it there is no forward between interfaces.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> OK Ivo, that's a great data.....I really appreciate this...
>>
>> But please tell me this at last:
>>
>> So WAN and LAN interfaces have no IP assigned ???
>> Do I have to create a bridging interface with WAN and LAN interfaces, and
>> in this case is it possible to have an IP-Less bridging interface ??? Or
>> the bridge it's not necessary and it's enough with WAN and LAN IP-Less in
>> promiscuous mode ???
>>
>> Thanks a lot again !!!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ivo Tonev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> you need to use the management network to download.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear, I can't understand at all....please be patient with me :(
>>>>
>>>> I'll use pFsense with Snort as a IPS because I see is easier than the
>>>> manually configuration of Snort.
>>>>
>>>> I have an ISP router with 200.1.1.1, a corporate firewall with
>>>> 200.1.1.2 and the condition is that I MUST LET THIS CONFIGURATION AS IT IS
>>>> NOW.
>>>>
>>>> So, I have to locate the pFsense server between the router and the
>>>> firewall, in "inline" mode.
>>>>
>>>> My pFsense server has 3 network interfaces, let's say: WAN connected to
>>>> router, LAN connected to corporate firewall and OPT1 for management with IP
>>>> 192.168.1.1.
>>>>
>>>> Now I have the question:
>>>>
>>>> How should I have to configure the WAN and LAN interfaces, with IP,
>>>> IP-less, creating a bridging interface IP-less or with IP ???? Because if I
>>>> create a bridge with WAN and LAN and I don't assign an IP, the IPS won't
>>>> download the signs from Internet...I'm a bit confused.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot, regards.
>>>>
>>>> JeLo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ivo Tonev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Always use out of band management.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Roberto Carna <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ivo, that's a good idea....but please tell me if I'm correct or not:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WAN, LAN, Bridge interfaces: IP-Less
>>>>>> OPT1: IP for management in a management network
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tnaks again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-09-30 9:27 GMT-03:00 Ivo Tonev <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> > I recommend you create a management network for OPT1 with private
>>>>>> IP.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Roberto Carna <
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I think this is good for us:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> - Router ISP with IP 200.0.0.1
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> - pFsense with the following interfaces:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>   a) WAN IP-Less
>>>>>> >>   b) LAN IP-Less
>>>>>> >>   c) OPT1 with IP 200.0.0.2 (management)
>>>>>> >>   d) Bridge with WAN and LAN interfaces, and Bridge interface
>>>>>> IP-Less
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> - Corporate firewall with IP 200.0.0.3
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> - Snort runs in Bridge interface
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Do you think this is correct ???
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Good night !!!
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Roberto
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> 2014-09-29 22:09 GMT-03:00 Jeronimo L. Cabral <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>> >> > I can say that I imagine this addresses space:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Router / IP 200.1.1.1 --- WAN IP-Less / pFsense/ LAN IP-Less ---
>>>>>> >> > Firewall /
>>>>>> >> > IP 200.1.1.2
>>>>>> >> >                                                            OPT1
>>>>>> / IP
>>>>>> >> > 200.1.1.3
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>  (management)
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > So, the WAN and LAN interfaces from pFsense are IP-LESS
>>>>>> (promiscuos
>>>>>> >> > mode),
>>>>>> >> > and the OPT1 interface from pFsense has a public IP as router and
>>>>>> >> > firewall.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Can I do this in pfsense ???
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral
>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> OK Ivo, this is very helpful to me....Suppose I have:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Router / IP 200.1.1.1 --- WAN/pFsense/LAN --- Firewall / IP
>>>>>> 200.1.1.2
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> I have to maintan invariable the addressing of this scenario,
>>>>>> so what
>>>>>> >> >> IP
>>>>>> >> >> addresses do I have to assign to WAN and LAN pFsense interfaces
>>>>>> ???
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Thanks a lot,
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> JeLo
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Ivo Tonev <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> In production environment you need 3 interfaces - one for WAN,
>>>>>> one for
>>>>>> >> >>> LAN and one for management.
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/quick_start/ips/ips_qsg.html
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:24 PM, compdoc <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>> > But you say: one interface for WAN, a second for
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>> >LAN...and which interface is for managing ???
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>> You manage with a browser from LAN, and optional also from
>>>>>> the WAN
>>>>>> >> >>>> port.
>>>>>> >> >>>> And with ssh from the LAN.
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> >>>> List mailing list
>>>>>> >> >>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >> >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> --
>>>>>> >> >>> Ivo R. Tonev
>>>>>> >> >>> +55 61 8409-2642
>>>>>> >> >>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> >>> List mailing list
>>>>>> >> >>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >> >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> > List mailing list
>>>>>> >> > [email protected]
>>>>>> >> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >> List mailing list
>>>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>>>> >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Ivo R. Tonev
>>>>>> > +55 61 8409-2642
>>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > List mailing list
>>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>>> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> List mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ivo R. Tonev
>>>>> +55 61 8409-2642
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> List mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> List mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ivo R. Tonev
>>> +55 61 8409-2642
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivo R. Tonev
> +55 61 8409-2642
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to