On 10/12/14 3:30 pm, Giles Coochey wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598
Unfortunately, there are people who stick their networks (erroneously) on 100.64/10 as well - including at least one government department in the UK - who shall remain nameless for the avoidance of ridicule :-)
I suppose it's marginally less 'bad' than the many large networks that squat on what was in the past bogons space, but that's now in active service as IPv4 addresses become ever scarcer resources.
On 10/12/14 3:13 pm, Karl Fife wrote:
Ultimately, it's a crap shoot, and the solution is to use IPV6 and 6:4 NAT for legacy.
If only someone could have forseen that IPv4 would run out sooner or later... oh wait, we did, didn't we, about a decade ago. :-)
(as an aside, is anyone using 6:4 in more than a dev/lab environment and managed to *not* encounter brokenness yet? Last time I tried running v6 only at home, tayga and DNS64 worked okay for general web usage, but Steam seemed to break completely)
Kind regards, Chris -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
