So if you don't wind up using them for CARP, use them for something else. Get
a smaller subnet from your provider and give back the original subnet.
If you have multiple subnets, the provider-facing one should not be used for
published services; in fact those addresses don't even have to be public IPs!
-Adam
On March 2, 2015 7:32:06 PM CST, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Using CARP implies that you care about reliability during edge cases
>and partial failures. If so, then you need to do it right and use 3
>IPs where you want 1 carp.
>
>I hear you. I guess part of me just dislikes the possibility of
>"wasting" 12 or 18 IPs (6 per subnet) a few years down the road, and
>yet getting a block of 128 that might never get used is possible
>also... Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
>
>Steve
>_______________________________________________
>pfSense mailing list
>https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
