I have seen that page and I don't know about "saying it all". I still
cannot figure out what the advantages and disadvantages are. All I want
is to be able to do a 1:1 NAT with some public IP addresses. These
addresses do not need to be used by the firewall directly. So in this
case it would sound like using Proxy ARP would be the best choice. But
are there any disadvantages? What about performance?
Regards.
On 3/8/2015 7:42 AM, PiBa wrote:
Says it all:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/What_are_Virtual_IP_Addresses
Which is better, that depends on what you need it to do.
Tim Hogan schreef op 8-3-2015 om 13:48:
I am setting up my firewall to do 1:1 NAT with a block of public IP
addresses. I have found several posts about setting up 1:1 NAT and
some of them say to use Proxy ARP when creating the Virtual IP and
others say to use IP Alias. Can someone full explain the difference
between the two and offer an opinion as to which would be better to use?
Regards
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
