-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

if i a reading correctly, i would be thinking Layer 2 would
essentially be at a frame level, so it would be closer to Link
Aggregation with Ethernet connections...

- --Tiernan

On 20/05/2015 15:41, WebDawg wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Tiernan OToole
> <tier...@tiernanotoole.net> wrote:
> 
> Morning all.
> 
> Might be a stupid question (or even idea) but i will ask anyway.
> 
> I have a server in Germany with a PFSense VM on it. I also have a 
> PFSesne machine in Dublin. The machine in Germany has a 1Gb
> uplink, and the machine in Dublin has 2 cable modems at 240 down 24
> up and a VSDL link at "about" 100 down 20 up.
> 
> I have managed to get a single IPSec tunnel working between 1 of
> the Cable modems and the German box, but now i am wondering about
> getting 2 more (one for each connection) running and balancing all
> three... Since they would be hitting the same machine, could it
> work?
> 
> Before anyone shouts, i know there is an overhead on IPSec
> tunnels, but given that the upstream of a single connection i have
> maxes out at 24mb, and the upstream between 3 should
> (theoretically) be 68, even with an overhead, it should (hopefully)
> be more than 24mb/s...
> 
> So, is any of this possible? or practical?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Tiernan
>> ______________________________________________
>> 
> 
> 
> Do you plan to bond the connections at layer2 or is this a layer3
> thing? _______________________________________________ pfSense
> mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list 
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=j+LO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to