On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 21:30:12 -0300
Nenhum_de_Nos <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I was trying the 2.2.4 i386 nanobsd version on the soekris 5501-70. It works 
> better then the earlier 2.2.x releases, but yet there is a catch.
> 
> My load quite always close to 1, when I have all two links full using one 
> conection on each (iperf test):
> 
> last pid: 16151;  load averages:  1.06,  1.37,  1.40    up 0+00:46:02  
> 00:17:03
> 43 processes:  3 running, 40 sleeping
> CPU: 47.6% user,  0.0% nice, 17.8% system, 24.5% interrupt, 10.0% idle
> Mem: 39M Active, 43M Inact, 77M Wired, 60M Buf, 312M Free
> Swap:
> 
>   PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME    WCPU COMMAND
> 16220 root        1  32    0 17248K  8304K RUN      7:24  15.87% lighttpd
>   285 root        1  22    0 57384K 34516K accept   1:12   3.17% php-fpm
> 43530 root        1  20    0 11384K  2572K RUN      0:01   0.20% top
>   284 root        1  52    0 57384K 34476K accept   1:28   0.00% php-fpm
>   283 root        1  52    0 57256K 33424K accept   1:14   0.00% php-fpm
> 42648 root        1  20    0 12216K  4084K select   0:10   0.00% miniupnpd
> 66652 unbound     1  20    0 21464K 11120K kqread   0:08   0.00% unbound
> 10161 root        1  20    0 10356K  1968K bpf      0:03   0.00% filterlog
> 11835 _dhcp       1  20    0 10312K  2044K select   0:02   0.00% dhclient
> 34749 root        1  20    0 10124K  1900K select   0:02   0.00% apinger
> 48046 root        1  20    0 10292K  2044K select   0:01   0.00% syslogd
> 70277 root        1  52   20 10584K  2224K wait     0:01   0.00% sh
>   315 root        1  20    0  8976K  3268K select   0:01   0.00% devd
> 11863 root        1  20    0 13104K 13132K select   0:01   0.00% ntpd
> 70222 root        1  20    0 10948K  3116K pause    0:00   0.00% tcsh
>   282 root        1  20    0 53028K 18568K kqread   0:00   0.00% php-fpm
> 35466 root        1  20    0 11572K  2632K piperd   0:00   0.00% rrdtool
> 49692 root        1  20    0 10236K  1960K nanslp   0:00   0.00% cron
> 
> This above is no web access. If I have a browser accessing the webui it get 
> worse a bit. The UI get slowish.
> 
> When I stop the iperf's, even though no links usage (close to 0), the load 
> drops to more then I would imagine and the web server process still is 
> oscilating the cpu usage. Is this normal ? Sometimes it gets close to 7% then 
> back and forth to around 15-20%.
> 
> last pid: 22953;  load averages:  0.42,  0.57,  0.91    up 0+00:56:22  
> 00:27:22
> 40 processes:  2 running, 38 sleeping
> CPU: 33.8% user,  0.0% nice,  1.1% system,  2.2% interrupt, 62.8% idle
> Mem: 37M Active, 44M Inact, 76M Wired, 60M Buf, 313M Free
> Swap:
> 
>   PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME    WCPU COMMAND
> 16220 root        1  30    0 17248K  8304K RUN      8:58  13.67% lighttpd
>   283 root        1  23    0 57256K 33476K accept   1:28   1.66% php-fpm
> 43530 root        1  20    0 11384K  2632K RUN      0:04   0.29% top
>   284 root        1  52    0 57384K 34476K accept   1:28   0.00% php-fpm
>   285 root        1  52    0 57384K 34516K accept   1:16   0.00% php-fpm
> 42648 root        1  20    0 12216K  4088K select   0:11   0.00% miniupnpd
> 66652 unbound     1  20    0 21464K 11240K kqread   0:09   0.00% unbound
> 10161 root        1  20    0 10356K  1968K bpf      0:04   0.00% filterlog
> 11835 _dhcp       1  20    0 10312K  2044K select   0:02   0.00% dhclient
> 34749 root        1  20    0 10124K  1900K select   0:02   0.00% apinger
> 48046 root        1  20    0 10292K  2044K select   0:02   0.00% syslogd
> 70277 root        1  52   20 10584K  2224K wait     0:01   0.00% sh
>   315 root        1  20    0  8976K  3268K select   0:01   0.00% devd
> 11863 root        1  20    0 13104K 13132K select   0:01   0.00% ntpd
>   282 root        1  20    0 53028K 18568K kqread   0:00   0.00% php-fpm
> 70222 root        1  20    0 10948K  3116K pause    0:00   0.00% tcsh
> 35466 root        1  20    0 11572K  2632K piperd   0:00   0.00% rrdtool
> 49692 root        1  39    0 10236K  1960K nanslp   0:00   0.00% cron
> 
> 
> Is it safe to say the 2.2.x are good for those old soekris ?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> matheus

Same old problem. When I tried to access the WEBUI, crash.

So, no 2.2.x for 5501 ...

matheus


-- 
Nenhum_de_Nos <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to