Probably this caused it workaround also there, as written in "https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.2.4_New_Features_and_Changes";

 * The forcesync patch for#2401
   <https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2401>is still considered harmful
   to the filesystem and has been kept out. As such, there may be some
   noticeable slowness with NanoBSD on certain slower disks, especially
   CF cards and to a lesser extent, SD cards. If this is a problem, the
   filesystem may be kept read-write on a permanent basis using the
   option on*Diagnostics > NanoBSD*. With the other above changes, risk
   is minimal. We advise replacing the affected CF/SD media by a new,
   faster card as soon as possible.#4822
   <https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4822>


Erik Anderson schreef op 13-8-2015 om 23:28:
Hello all -

I've been running pfSense on my ALIX 2d3 happily for many years now.
For the most part, it still does its job well. However, with most
recent release, any changes made in the GUI take a *long* time to
commit. By long I mean ~2 minutes. That's how long it takes from
clicking "Save" to the screen refresh and the "Apply changes" button
showing up.

Is this slow GUI performance to be expected? Was there some change in
v2.2.4 that would have caused this?

I realize that the 2d3 board is getting quite long in the tooth, so
perhaps this is just something I need to deal with until I finally
cave in and purchase an SG-2220.

Thank you!
-Erik
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to