When I ran that command, I got an error. It pointed me to an alias that it
thought was a host list alias and that needed changing to a port list alias.
I do not know why 2.2.x treated it differently to 2.1.x though.

Kind regards, 

Seb 


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of A Mohan Rao mohanrao83-at-gmail.com |pfSense/Allow + 
> Forward to Syntec|
> Sent: 17 August 2015 16:18
> To: ****************; pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.1.5 to 2.2.4 update problems...
> 
> Pls try with AMD64 Pfsense it works good at my pfSense server 
> only filter
> http not https...
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mohan
> On Aug 17, 2015 6:26 PM, "Chuck Mariotti" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks, I had rebooted the server a few times trying to 
> resolve. Is that
> > the same? On the reload with error, did it point to 
> something specific?
> > I ask because I'm not sure how to debug this without taking 
> everything
> > down all over again.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seb
> > Sent: August-17-15 6:40 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.1.5 to 2.2.4 update problems...
> >
> > Maybe you had the same problem as me.
> >
> > Log in on ssh shell and then try running:
> > pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
> > This should reload the rules, but might throw an error..
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Seb
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Chuck
> > > Mariotti cmariotti-at-xunity.com
> > > Sent: 15 August 2015 22:26
> > > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.1.5 to 2.2.4 update problems...
> > >
> > > I should point out that at one point there was a "DNS Rebind"
> > > message in the best browser for one of the sites 
> internally (not sure
> > > if that's related).
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Chuck
> > > Mariotti
> > > Sent: August-15-15 1:16 PM
> > > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: [pfSense] pfSense 2.1.5 to 2.2.4 update problems...
> > >
> > > I had a need to update to the latest pfSense. I had a replacement
> > > machine with the latest 2.2.4. Took the config file from 2.1.5 and
> > > restored it...
> > >
> > > It got stuck on the restoring packages and I eventually 
> unlocked and
> > > just left it as-is.
> > >
> > > Swapped over the connection to the replacement and some internal
> > > websites (https) stopped being available to the public... 
> internally
> > > no problems.
> > >
> > > I looked quickly but could not find what was happening 
> with a simple
> > > update. So I switched it back to the original.
> > >
> > > I reinstalled 2.1.5 on the replacement machine... restored the
> > > config... switched it over and all worked perfectly.
> > >
> > > I ran the in-place update and it completed without issues 
> (including
> > > packages)... but again, many internal sites not available to the
> > > public side.
> > >
> > > Did I miss something in the upgrade method? There is a 
> patch that was
> > > previously applied but I don't think it was related and 
> it didn't say
> > > it was enabled.
> > >
> > > Fix SHA1 certs
> > >
> > > http://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/fd750cd064a46f364a7e0
> > > 6c9fe27d46ce11cd09a.patch
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I did not have much time to debug since 
> there was an
> > > unrelated hardware failure which extended the appox downtime from
> > > 5-10mins to about 3 hours.... So was mostly interesting 
> it restoring
> > > things back to normal.
> > >
> > > To be honest, I don't know if it was both http(s) or just 
> https only
> > > that was not accessible... I think it was https but it's 
> too late to
> > > test it again. There is a NLBS serving up some of those 
> sites if that
> > > matters.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions would be greatful.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pfSense mailing list
> > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pfSense mailing list
> > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pfSense mailing list
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> > _______________________________________________
> > pfSense mailing list
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> 

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to