> Le 12 mai 2016 à 11:11, Olivier Mascia <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> Assuming two sites having to use NPt to map IPv6 IP Alias from WAN to 
> fd00::/64 like on the LAN.
> 
> For instance:
> 
> Site A: a:b:c:1000::1/56 is the WAN IPv6.  And a:b:c:1001::1/64 (IP Alias on 
> WAN) match with fd01::1/64 on LAN through NPt.
> Site B: w:x:y:1000::1/56 is the WAN IPv6.  And w:x:y:1002::1/64 (IP Alias on 
> WAN) match with fd02::1/64 on LAN through NPt.
> 
> IPsec with a phase1 IKEv2 (over IPv6, but same issue with IPv4) between WAN 
> IPs.
> Along with a phase2 (tunnel6) defined between fd01::/64 and fd02::/64.
> 
> IPsec connection shows up, including phase2. But nothing walks through the 
> tunnel.
> For instance Site A LAN fd01::2 pings some Site B LAN fd02::2, and nothing is 
> routed through the tunnel.
> I'm quite persuaded it has to do with the NPt.
> 
> When does exactly the NPt translation occurs and how does it interact with 
> IPsec tunnels defined?  That would help understand where this is failing and 
> if there is a path to a solution.

Some more experiments and searches later... NPt doesn't seem to be the culprit, 
2.3-REL looks like it is.
One of the ends is 2.2.2 (a nearly exactly one year old release - 14 Apr 2015), 
and the other is 2.3.

From the 2.3 site (pinging the remote) I can capture the right ESP packets 
going out through the WAN interface.
On the other end 2.2.2 site, I can capture on the ipsec interface both the 
incoming echo requests and the outgoing echo replies.
I can also track the corresponding outgoing ESP packets on its WAN interface.
But the 2.3 site does not get *anything*. I can't even see an incoming ESP 
packet (we're taking IPv6 here all along) on its WAN.

-- 
Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia, integral.be/om



_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to