On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Olivier Mascia <[email protected]> wrote: >> Le 24 mai 2016 à 17:56, Doug Lytle <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Is the IPv4 requirement something thats planned to be removed in future >>> releases? >>> >>> I don't assume many people have adopted IPv6 yet. >> >> Ensuring stable, robust and complete IPv6 (+IPv4) support was and is >> the primary goal for 2.4 >> >> IPv6-only was a non-goal so far, so nobody invested time into it yet - >> but of course, eventually nobody wants to bother with IPv4 anymore :-) >> >> Realistically, though, there's more pressing things to work on - like >> cipher negotiation (so you can upgrade encryption without having to >> roll out new configs to all your clients), actually *releasing* 2.4, etc. > > You're going too far compared to what I asked: I'm not asking for IPv6 only > support. > It just is that I have a need to create an OpenVPN tunnel between two sites > only transporting IPv6
He's just quoting a post to the OpenVPN list on said topic. You can transport only IPv6 across an OpenVPN tunnel, but you'll need an IPv4 tunnel network defined even if you don't use it. Requirement of OpenVPN. _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
