Functionally related to the implicit auto-lockout rule. Makes sense.
Thanks.
On 8/31/2016 9:49 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 8/31/2016 9:30 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
This suggests the implicit rules are evaluated BEFORE the explicit
rules. Is there a good reason they're evaluated first? I'd expect them
to be after to allow for debugging, logging, blocking, etc.
Yes, that is done on purpose. Otherwise it would be far too easy for a
user to block DHCP with a manual rule on the tab and then lose connectivity.
Jim
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
