same ports? you mean that same port assigment and nic can be different type?
eero 15.11.2016 11.36 ip. "Steve Yates" <st...@teamits.com> kirjoitti: > Any hardware should work fine. They recommend a separate NIC/port > for the sync traffic since if syncing states there can be a lot of traffic > (if not syncing state there is probably very little). I don't think it > needs to be identical hardware but the rules would need to copy over so it > would need the same ports. > > One gotcha that caught me...under "System/High Availability > Sync/Configuration Synchronization Settings (XMLRPC Sync)" there is a > "Remote System Username" field. That field is ignored, and "admin" is > always used. > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero > Volotinen > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:20 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > Subject: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha > > Hi List, > > What are requirements for pfsense ha clustering? does any of x86 hardware > work with ha? does hardware need to be identical? > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
