how about disabling pfs?

Eero

2017-02-03 13:25 GMT+02:00 Roland Giesler <roland@greentree.systems>:

> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi>
> wrote:
>
>> It's a bit antique selection of ciphers.
>>
>
> It is indeed.  We were experimenting for a long time with many others and
> got similar result (no matches).  So I opted to check what pfSense offers
> and set Sonicwall to ask for that, but Sonicwall can't do MODP_3072,
> which is the only combination of what pfSense offers and what Sonicwall
> supports.
>
> We gave up in the end and opted to use SSH tunnels to work through, rather
> than set up a VPN.  In the end we may have to set up OpenVPN, which mobile
> clients rather that site-to-site...  :-(  Not what we had in mind.
>
> Roland
>
>
>>
>> Problem is in DH group. try enabling same DH also in pfsense.
>>
>> --
>> Eero
>>
>> 2017-02-03 13:17 GMT+02:00 Roland Giesler <roland@greentree.systems>:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What hardware is other side running? Why you are trying to use 3des?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The other side is Sonicwall.  I'm using 3DES because it's enabled by
>>> default and seeming a simple place to start.
>>>
>>> However, regardless of what I select (by ticking the boxes - net very
>>> difficult), that is then not offered.  So if I select 3DES, it is not
>>> offered.  If I select SHA256 it's not offered, and so on.
>>>
>>> Roland
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eero
>>>>
>>>> 2017-01-17 16:36 GMT+02:00 Roland Giesler <rol...@thegreentree.za.net>:
>>>>
>>>>> We've battled all afternoon to establish an IPSec site-to-site
>>>>> connection.
>>>>> Here's what happens:
>>>>>
>>>>> TimeProcessPIDMessage
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[NET] <197> sending packet: from
>>>>> 129.232.232.130[500] to 105.27.116.62[500] (56 bytes)
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[ENC] <197> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1
>>>>> request
>>>>> 2809641300 [ N(NO_PROP) ]
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[IKE] <197> no proposal found
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[CFG] <197> configured proposals:
>>>>> IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_3072,
>>>>> IKE:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/CAMELLIA_CBC_128/CAM
>>>>> ELLIA_CBC_192/CAMELLIA_CBC_256/3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/HM
>>>>> AC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_MD5_96/HMAC_SHA1_96/A
>>>>> ES_XCBC_96/AES_CMAC_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/P
>>>>> RF_HMAC_SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_MD
>>>>> 5/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_B
>>>>> P/ECP_512_BP/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_8192/MODP_2048/MODP_20
>>>>> 48_256/MODP_1024,
>>>>> IKE:AES_GCM_16_128/AES_GCM_16_192/AES_GCM_16_256/AES_GCM_12_
>>>>> 128/AES_GCM_12_192/AES_GCM_12_256/AES_GCM_8_128/AES_GCM_8_19
>>>>> 2/AES_GCM_8_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/PRF_HMAC
>>>>> _SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_MD5/PRF_H
>>>>> MAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_BP/ECP_5
>>>>> 12_BP/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_8192/MODP_2048/MODP_2048_256/MODP_1024
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[CFG] <197> received proposals:
>>>>> IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1536
>>>>> Jan 17 15:58:53 charon 05[IKE] <197> 105.27.116.62 is initiating a
>>>>> Aggressive Mode IKE_SA
>>>>>
>>>>> The strange thing is that I have set 3DES and SHA1 to in my setup, yet
>>>>> it
>>>>> is not being offered.  I have also test quite a few other like AES 265
>>>>> and
>>>>> SHA2, but they are also not offered.  The other side (SonicWall) is
>>>>> offering what we set mutually.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a bug?  If now, how to I force pfSense to behave and start
>>>>> using
>>>>> the settings I set.
>>>>>
>>>>> IPSec IKE V2 with pre-shared key.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm running 2.3.2_1
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone that has seen this?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Roland Giesler
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pfSense mailing list
>>>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/2b8864f31199d0082f474438ad99b04c615adf78?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailtrack.io%2F&signature=1032642e759d6d34>Sent
> with Mailtrack
> <https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=rol...@thegreentree.za.net&idSignature=22>
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to