I figured they were probably harmless but this may be my first time upgrading 
with pfBlockerNG installed.

https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Upgrade_Guide#Packages

To save a click, the entire section's text:
"It is always safest to remove packages before upgrading to a new major 
release. Packages will be reinstalled afterward, but are frequently a source of 
problems. To ensure a smooth upgrade, note the installed packages, remove them, 
perform the upgrade, and then reinstall whichever packages are necessary."

--

Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. Hellenthal
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:54 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Upgrading versions - uninstall packages?

I for one have not had to do this thus far. But those pfB messages are harmless 
and more of an alert that you will need to reload the IP tables afterwards but 
that’s trivial. Keep in mind that I have not done that upgrade yet in a test 
environment before a maintenance window I have on Saturday.

Curious do you have a link of where it states to remove those ? I’d like to 
review the reason why as I can’t see anything other than they just don’t want 
you to block IP comm to the update servers.

-- 
 Onward!, 
 Jason Hellenthal, 
 Systems & Network Admin, 
 Mobile: 0x9CA0BD58, 
 JJH48-ARIN

On Jul 20, 2017, at 16:27, Steve Yates <[email protected]> wrote:

I started to upgrade from 2.3.3_1 to 2.3.4_1 today and as instructed by the 
docs I uninstalled Suricata and PFBlockerNG first.  I immediately got a flood 
of alerts like "Unresolvable source alias 'pfB_GeoIPUSv4' for rule ...".  Those 
are of course popular packages.  Do you all normally uninstall and reinstall 
either or both of those two packages during version upgrades?

Thanks,

Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to