Adam,

Actually, the reason SIXXS shut down is exactly the opposite of what you
said. SIXXS shut down because IPv6 adoption was going too slow and a number
of ISPs were actually telling their customers "we don't plan to implement
IPv6 because you can get it from SIXXS if you really want it." In effect,
ISPs were using tunnels as a way of *reducing *IPv6 rollouts.

Vick,

I also have an HE tunnel at home because my ISP is dragging their feet
about implementing IPv6. In fact, my main guest WiFi network runs *only* IPv6.
Most of my guests only care about Gmail and YouTube, and those have been
IPv6 enabled for ages. It's an experiment to see how many visitors can get
away with not noticing that they have no IPv4 connectivity.

Moshe

--
Moshe Katz
-- [email protected]
-- +1(301)867-3732 <(301)%20867-3732>

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> So?  Neither do I.  I don't have native IPv6 at the office either.  But
> both are fully IPv6-connected.
> That's what Hurricane Electric tunnels are for.  (And SIXXS, formerly, but
> they've decided that IPv6 penetration has reached a point where they're not
> needed anymore.  Hahahaha...)
>
> http://www.tunnelbroker.net/
>
> Disclaimer: my home situation is a bit of an anomaly - the nearest HE IPv6
> tunnel endpoint is <5msec away from my home router [wireless, not DSL or
> cable], and my ISP has a 10Gbps connection to them.  Performance is VERY
> satisfactory.  However, even my office, where the nearest HE tunnel
> endpoint is 30+msec away gets perfectly acceptable performance on IPv6.
> Largely because IPv6 paths tend to be shorter and transit fewer routers.
> (There are a number of factors at play; sometimes IPv6 is tunneled over
> IPv4, which means the path isn't *really* shorter.)
>
> -Adam
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vick
> > Khera
> > Sent: August 2, 2017 21:28
> > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] IPv6 1:1 NAT problems
> >
> > Nice. Thanks for the explanation. My IPv6 knowledge is slowly being built
> > up. Not having IPv6 at my home router makes it hard to play with. I've
> > not had the courage to bring "live" my direct allocation at the data
> center
> > yet.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to