Hi Ernst, Many radios, 12ish or so, but there are no vlans defined on the appliance, its all physical interfaces.
I'm going to chalk it up to some sort of human error, i don't want to believe what appeared to happened, happened. Will be setting up services to watch for a similar situation occurrence though. greg On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ernst den Broeder <[email protected]> wrote: > More than 1 wifi radio? Are you sure they are connected to the same > pfSense interface? I've seen something like this before that was caused by > a single mis-configured radio (wrong vlan). > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 21, 2017, at 6:02 PM, greg whynott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:47 PM, PiBa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Nothing weird i could spot.. Besides that most wifi rules are kinda > >> duplicated. (Some with 'S/SA' others without.) > >> > > > > > > You are seeing duplicate rules defined for UDP and TCP, UDP is > > connection-less, no SYN SYN-ACK bits to test for. :) > > > > > > You are correct, many likely are redundant but since its a 'open to > > internet' network (such as 80/udp), I'm ok with it. > > > > thanks for taking the time to consider things PiBa, > > greg > > _______________________________________________ > > pfSense mailing list > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
