Do you know this to be true because credentials and such are hosted on one interface, but not another?
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Adrian Zaugg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > With two WAN interfaces and with an OpenVPN server on each, bound to its > interface, there is a wrong IP assertion in case the first interfaces > does not get an IP. > > In Detail: > - a system with two WAN interfaces that both get their IP by DHCP > - on each WAN there is an OpenVPN Server configured, bound to one iface > If for some reason no IP can be obtained on the first WAN interface, the > OpenVPN instance actually bound to WAN1 does grab the IP of the WAN2 > interface. The second OpenVPN instance cannot start then and mourns > "address already in use". > > I would expect that the OpenVPN instance of WAN1 doesn't grab the > address of WAN2. It seems to me that this is a bug. > > Best regards, Adrian. > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
