Is that real line "mtu" or just virtual parameter?

Eero

2017-11-26 6:04 GMT+02:00 Jim Thompson <[email protected]>:

>
> To explain why this is an good thing:
>
> One of the problems here is that while the AES-CBC (actual crypto) can be
> accelerated via AES-NI, the HMAC isn’t (very new Intel parts have SHA
> instructions, but no support in OpenSSL in any version of FreeBSD or
> pfSense as yet).
>
> So, at the end of the day, your speed will be throttled by the speed of
> SHA-256 on <= ~1450 byte packets, as well as the overhead of making two
> “crypto” passes (one enc/dec, one hmac) over the stream of data.
>
> AES-GCM is a AEAD algorithm, so you get the HMAC as a “side effect”.
>
> OpenVPN recommends AES-GCM for OpenVPN >= 2.4.
> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SWEET32
>
> The other thing you can do, as indicated, is to run the “MTU” up such that
> the (OpenVPN) packet size increases, which reduces the overhead of both the
> TUN/TAP interface, as well as some of the overhead of handing relatively
> short packets to OpenSSL for encryption/decryption.
>
> Jim
>
> > On Nov 25, 2017, at 2:51 PM, Eero Volotinen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Well,
> >
> > cipher AES-256-CBC
> > auth SHA256
> >
> > thinking to upgrade this to AES-256-GCM
> >
> > Eero
> >
> > 2017-11-25 21:30 GMT+02:00 Jim Thompson <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> What crypto transform and authentication are you running?  Maybe try
> >> AES-GCM (which is AES-NI accelerated) at both ends if both devices
> support
> >> it. Might need pfSense 2.4 for this.
> >>
> >> Try setting the (OpenVPN) MTU to a larger number.
> >>
> >> More hints: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=123915.0
> >>
> >>> On Nov 25, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There is a lot of information missing here.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You have a better Netgate unit, but if the internet port on it is
> >> connected to a 100Mbps switch, performance will suck.  Same on the LAN
> >> side.  And if the ports are mismatched(half vs full duplex for
> instance),
> >> performance will suffer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What percentage of the gigabit link and/or LAN link on Netgate are you
> >> utilizing before adding in OpenVPN ?  Your ISP may be over subscribed
> and
> >> it's uplinks are saturated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You may be pushing too much traffic through the NetGate and it can not
> >> handle the load.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In other words, based on the limited info you provided, you have not
> >> provided proof that it's a problem with the NetGate.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lyle Giese
> >>>
> >>>> On 11/25/17 06:34, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >>>> Hi list,
> >>>>
> >>>> We are running pfsense 2.3 on netgate sg-8860.
> >>>>
> >>>> Device is connected to internet with gigabit link, but openvpn speed
> is
> >>>> very slow (about 50Mbit/s). Any idea how to get more speed to vpn
> >> clients?
> >>>>
> >>>> Eero
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> pfSense mailing list
> >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> >>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pfSense mailing list
> >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> >>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pfSense mailing list
> >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > pfSense mailing list
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to