On 01/09/2018 05:58 PM, Gé Weijers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Walter Parker <walt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Steve Yates <st...@teamits.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm not a developer but I would think it's dependent on FreeBSD releasing >>> the update, plus testing by pfSense/Netgate. However, I would think >>> there's not much concern with PCs running pfSense, since raw code would >> not >>> normally be running on the pfSense box...? > Agreed, if someone manages to run malicious code on your pfSense box you > have bigger problems. I disagree. The fact that user processes can gain kernel-level access *is* the bigger problem. A buffer overflow affecting a process running as _dhcp would not otherwise result in such a severe issue. > HOWEVER: running pfSense as a virtual machine may not be the best idea if > you do not have full control over the other VMs running on the same > hardware.
This contradicts the majority of the purpose of virtualization. _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold