Hi,

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:05:21 +1100 Tankred Hase <[email protected]>
wrote:
> As far as I understand a large part of the work was done by the guys
> at recurity with gpg4browsers. What do you think Carsten... would dual
> licensing be an acceptable option?

I absolutely fail to see why any change to the licensing is required.
After all, this is a JS library. You can source it from anywhere and
with that fulfill LGPL with any project. I see no pro argument here.

Dual- or other relicensing, on the other hand, just provides an
incentive for frequent forks, which is absolutely against the interest
of an open source library.

Specifically, why would you need to do OpenPGP in JS for iOS devices at
all? It should be obvious that native code is always preferred when
doing crypto, and iOS apps are native code.

cheers
Felix

-- 
Recurity Labs GmbH           | Felix 'FX' Lindner 
http://www.recurity-labs.com | [email protected] 
Wrangelstrasse 4             | Fon: +49 30 69539993-0
10997 Berlin                 | PGP: A740 DE51 9891 19DF 0D05  
Germany                      |      13B3 1759 C388 C92D 6BBB
HRB 105213 B, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, GF Felix Lindner
_______________________________________________

http://openpgpjs.org

Reply via email to