Sounds cool. Do you have your code up on github?

Tankred
Am 19.08.2012 20:09 schrieb "Thomas Oberndörfer" <[email protected]>:

> I'm also currently working on a chrome extension. My main focus is to
> provide a generic solution that is not bound to one specific webmailer.
> The OpenPGP functionality should be integrated into the webmailer UI (so
> no separate tab solution) and work for as many providers as possible.
> I do this by scanning the page for the PGP header and then injecting an
> overlay that is placed on top of the PGP text.
>
> It's already quite ready to release, so I hope this can be done next week.
>
> I also see that current PGP solutions on the desktop will only attract
> specific users. So the question that I had when I started this project was:
> how can I reach the average user? What can be done to improve usability?
>
> My assumption is that for the majority of users webmailer offer the best
> solution (on the desktop). It looks like it's a trend that has a growing
> impact:
> stop of active development on Mozilla Thunderbird was already mentioned
> and I also was quite impressed when I saw what Microsoft is offering with
> outlook.com.
>
> That means: let's build generic OpenPGP browser plugins for all the
> browsers out there and we reach maximum amount of users.
> The bad news is: there is mobile with native apps. Here I see the gaia
> email app brought up by Tankred interesting: if this could be
> the basis for a mobile email client that runs on all platforms this would
> fill a gap.
>
> @Sean: thanks for creating the roadmap. BTW for the versioning I would
> also prefer a classical x.x.x scheme. Maybe that can be worked on once
> the roadmap is more clear.
>
> Thomas
>
>
> 2012/8/13 Tankred Hase <[email protected]>
>
>> I wasnt trying to suggest that you or anyone do this work. Sorry if it
>> came across like that. I was mearly trying to get your technical opinion on
>> such an email app, since you had already done the gmail extention.
>>
>> One of the painpoints I see with PGP on the desktop is getting everything
>> installed and configured is probably too much for the average user. What
>> struck me when I saw imap client implemtation in js, is that one could take
>> this and bundle it with openpgp.js into a simple to use preconfiged email
>> app.
>>
>> The point with the seperate namespace is interesting though. Thanks.
>>
>> Tankred
>> Am 13.08.2012 06:11 schrieb "Sean Colyer" <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>  I hadn't seen that work, but it does look interesting. I'm not quite
>>> sure what work you were envisioning I, or the openpgp.js team, would help
>>> with this project. I think the most likely path would be to just make
>>> openpgp.js work with Firefox (when it's ready) and allow gaia to craft an
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> For my intentions, the sandboxing is actually advantageous for security
>>> of the extension because it means that the private key is stored in the
>>> extension namespace rather than gmail's.
>>>
>>> I do not foresee myself extensively working on a direct implementation
>>> with gaia, but perhaps I could help them get a start if that would be
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tankred Hase <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Sean,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if you've seen the work Mozilla is currently doing on
>>>> its Firefox OS email client. They are building an IMAP client in js, which
>>>> is being optimized for syncing with gmail and yahoo mail.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia-email-libs-and-more
>>>>
>>>> Also David Dahl confirmed window.crypto.getRandomValues() is now
>>>> implemented in gecko and is to be in "FF 17, maybe sooner".
>>>>
>>>> I dont know if you have been following crypto.cat in the last few
>>>> days. They are going extention only in cryptocat 2, offering apps for
>>>> chrome and mozilla WebRT and disallowing direct webusage over https.
>>>>
>>>> I have taken a look at your Chrome extention for Gmail. A complete
>>>> signed installable email app could perhaps deal with some of the issues
>>>> regarding sandboxing, code delivery and storing the private key in the
>>>> gmail domain. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Tankred
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> http://openpgpjs.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> http://openpgpjs.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> http://openpgpjs.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://openpgpjs.org
>
>
_______________________________________________

http://openpgpjs.org

Reply via email to