Hi Erik, Thank you for the answer.
> I work in a project where we are using OpenPGP.js in a production > environment. We however use it to encrypt larger files which forced us to > make a few changes. Would love to read more about this. > If you guys want to use our logo on the OpenPGP.js site we can probably > arrange that as well. Yes! > If you guys are interested we would like to commit this back to the project > for others to use. ... > Would these changes be of interest to the project? Definitely! I think it would be extremely helpful to have a short benchmark before and after your changes that we can publish. Best regards, Alex On 08.01.2013, at 18:33, Erik Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been on this mailing list for a while without writing. I work in a > project where we are using OpenPGP.js in a production environment. We however > use it to encrypt larger files which forced us to make a few changes. The > major one being to support blobs when decrypting/encrypting data. We had to > do this since we are likely to operate on files > 100 mb and it was just not > possible to pass around a string with that size. > > If you guys are interested we would like to commit this back to the project > for others to use. Today I'm mostly reaching out to get the conversation > started. There's some work that has to be done on our part before merging so > I just wanted to touch base on what we've done. Right now we have added > prefixed functions when we deal with large files so rather than calling > write_packet we call write_packet_large and so forth. We did this mostly to > keep our changes separate from the original source. We are willing to change > this in however way fits the project guidelines better. There are some > additional changes that comes to this but this would be the major one. Would > these changes be of interest to the project? > > If you guys want to use our logo on the OpenPGP.js site we can probably > arrange that as well. > > Best Regards > Erik > > On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:16 AM, Alex (via OpenPGP.js) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Happy New Year. I think it's time to give the OpenPGP.js project a bit more >> "love" in 2013. There are many items on the todo list - so let us address >> the first ones: >> >> 1. Marketing: Which projects are currently using OpenPGP.js? I would like to >> add links and logos to our web page. Also I just restarted to use the >> Twitter account http://twitter.com/openpgpjs to retweet and answer related >> posts. Anyone is welcome to join. Also I've created a new simple logo (see >> attached). >> >> 2. Developing: It should be very easy for users to integrate the library >> into their web pages and for developers to enhance the current version. I >> think we can improve the current situation. So we also might want to move >> this mailing list to another one with archive support (btw: is a mailing >> list still an adequate perfect medium?) >> >> 3. Security: There are a lot of discussions about the advantages and >> drawbacks of using a JavaScript based OpenPGP library (within browsers or >> not). We should write some sort of "summarized and syntetic" (@naif: thanks.) >> >> What should we address in 2013 from your point of view? >> >> Best regards, Alex >> >> -- >> http://openpgpjs.org >> >> >> <icon_openpgpjs.png> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> http://openpgpjs.org > > _______________________________________________ > > http://openpgpjs.org
