On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Niklas <[email protected]> wrote: > Then perhaps you should leave it alone. People don't replace important >
I would appreciate a more welcoming attitude towards contributions. This functionality is not a replacement but an addition. If there are currently no resources in this project to evaluate its correctness - fair enough. Thomas On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Niklas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013-06-23 13:24, Dr. M. Weihrauch wrote: > > I don't exactly know > > Then perhaps you should leave it alone. People don't replace important > functionality because it's mad easy to do wrong and can have > catastrophical impact on those that rely on it for security, not because > it's a programmatic challenge calling an alternative method when the > original one is missing. > > /N > _______________________________________________ > > http://openpgpjs.org >
_______________________________________________ http://openpgpjs.org
