Hi Robert,
Haven't had time to think about your first item. As for:
>Further I would like to have a way to refer to the literal object
>name or to the 'this' object. Things like this/name, this/size,
>this/constructed? etc. would be really nice. What do you think?
>
wouldn't self work?
>> obj: make object! [
val-1: "this is me."
print-val: func [] [print self/val-1]
]
>> obj/print-val
this is me.
>>
Elan
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? robert . muench
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(2) icimjs
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(2) robert . muench
- [REBOL] Re: Constructor semantics? Re:(2) dm98411
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(4) robert . muench
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(5... icimjs
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? R... robert . muench
- [REBOL] Constructor semantic... icimjs
- [REBOL] Constructor semantic... robert . muench
- [REBOL] Constructor semantic... icimjs
- [REBOL] Constructor semantic... robert . muench
- [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(3) brian . hawley
