pekr wrote:
> print "^(1B)[10CHi!"
>
> in opposite to:
>
> cursor: func [parm [string!]][join "^(1B)[" parm]
> print ["How are you" cursor "7D" cursor "K"]
>
> which one print is more readable?
Um, neither? What about:
print ["How are you" Cursor-function]
where 'Cursor-function is replaced with a word that actually describes
what the cursor sequence does, and when evaluated, produces the
corresponding escape sequence? I thought that would be more readable
and easier to understand.
Andrew Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
-><-
