> I knew Jeff would jump all over my example <grumble grumble> ;-)
Hey-- You told me I'm the script cop. Just doing my job. Ha ha
just kidding.
But no reason to grumble there, Bo. It wasn't my intention to "jump
all over" your example. Just trying to point out a different way to do
it and to rant about efficiency. But there's no "right" answer.
> I also toyed with enbase, but it wasn't as straightforward from a
> user's standpoint in my opinion as the method I chose.
ENBASE was put there to be used! (-;
>But mine still uses less bytes to store the function so there!
You got me there. Leaner and slower. ;-)
Cheers--
-jeff
