Hey! Now that's an idea! Sounds like you have some interest in it!
<grin> We all can't wait to hear about your progress as you get
started on this new project of yours. Hehe... if you show interest in
it, it's all yours.
(:
Sterling
> Nick Lothian wrote:
> > Actually, I suspect that won't fix anything.
>
> Actually, together with my %Patch.r (it's also in Ingo Holman [?sp]
> tools on rebol.org), where the function was rewritted, it's all ready
> fixed problems for at least one person on this list. :-) I just grew
> bored of rewriting it for the new versions of REBOL.
>
> > The problem with claiming to be Mozilla compatible is that then some
> sites (badly written sites - but that is quite a lot) expect you have
> Javascript and they dynamically generate content using
> document.write('stuff'') or whatever it is.
>
> The .ASP sites are also a concern.
>
> But the real interesting part is, a JavaScript interpreter for REBOL!
>
> Andrew Martin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
> Online @ 33,600 Baud!
> -><-
