[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I'm really happy that people are eating up the new manual, but...
>
> Save a tree!  Please don't print the REBOL BETA DRAFT manual,
> it will change a lot!  Even this week!
>
> For instance, all of the examples will very soon display their
> actual results.  Surely you don't want to print it before that's
> added!  There are also various typos/corrections and numerous
> other functions to add.
>
> However, please feel free to email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
> any kind of problem, error, or addition in the manual.  That's
> a direct route to the documentation dept, and I read each one
> as well.
>

Hi Carl,

I would like to suggest extension of tcp ports section. I remember how I
explained ot one of Phoenix folks working with ports is not all that
difficult, once REBOL user understands the issue.

e.g.

- 'first on listen port will wait forever
- 'first on another tcp port will be timed out, so suggest to use wait
- show Sterling's aproach of wait command used on reduced block of ports

- show wait with one argument of time type (wait [port1 port2 5])
- explain to people, that there is no 'second, 'third etc. applied to
tcp ports. give them example of tetris, where once bottom line is
filled, everything shifts dows. If I understand it correctly, tcp ports
work in similar manner - you read out from them by "'first port", until
the buffer is not empty ....
- explain differences between buffered, direct, binary, etc. ports ....

etc.

I am not sure my comments are valid enough, so decide for yourself ...

Cheers,

-pekr-


>
> -Carl

Reply via email to