Donald Dalley wrote:
>Some nit-picking...
Well, here's some more ;)
>I noticed that you use "Version:" the way most of us would want to use it,
but
>that is not how I remember it's use being decribed by Carl (his message is
>surely archived). If I remember correctly, "Version:" is to name which
version
>of *REBOL* is required to run your program properly. The REBOL header needs a
>place for *our* program version. ;^)
Actually, Andrew uses Version: correctly. You are thinking of Needs.
Andrew's statement of Needs: 2.2.0 (the REBOL version) is correct too.
I guess your problem is solved!
Brian
