[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks for your ERROR explanation. Don't you think that CURRIED should have
> worked as originally written (without the non-re-entrant bugs in Rebol)?
Thing is, I don't think that's a bug. Have a look at my other
posts.
I don't have time right now, but I'll show you what I mean as soon
as I have some.
Ciao,
/Gabriele./
o--------------------) .-^-. (----------------------------------o
| Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila |
| GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ |
o--------------------) `-v-' (----------------------------------o
