Robert, empty? is kind of confusing, since it's just a synonym for tail? and doesn't really tell you if there are no elements in the block, as there might be some before the index point: >> test-block: tail [1 2 3 4 5] == [] >> empty? test-block == true >> head test-block == [1 2 3 4 5] You can always use: >> empty? head test-block == false to find out if test-block is really empty. See you, Eric
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re: bo
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re: 70740 . 503
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(2) KGD03011
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(2) news . ted
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(3) icimjs
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(4) news . ted
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(5) rryost
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(... news . ted
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(3) larry
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(3) mailinglists
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(4) news . ted
