> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 3:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:
> empty? is kind of confusing, since it's just a synonym for
> tail? and doesn't really tell you if there are no elements in the block,
> as there might be some before the index point:
Hi, that's the point (!!) and that's why I don't use empty? blind less with
blocks.
> You can always use:
>
> >> empty? head test-block
> == false
>
> to find out if test-block is really empty.
Well, I would like to avoid this and that's why I would like to see that
empty? works on the whole block and not in relation to the index point.
Robert
